EDUCATION FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE REVIEW PANEL

Item No____

1 November 2000

 

 

EDUCATION IN NORFOLK SEPTEMBER 2000

(Report by Director of Education)

This report highlights major features of the Education Service at the start of the 2000/2001 school year.

 

 

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. 1.1 It is important that the Members are given a clear picture of how the Education Service is performing. This report deals not only with schools, but with the wide range of education provision in Norfolk.

  3. STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY CHILDREN IN NORFOLK SCHOOLS

2.1 It has been the position for some time that attainment in Norfolk has tended to be slightly below the average for similar Shire Counties elsewhere in England, but about on a par with national averages as a whole. I will not be in a position to report fully on comparative data until later in the Autumn term. However, early indications are that the overall performance in Norfolk, at Key Stages 1 and 2, is improving at slightly better than the national rate and is closing the gap with similar counties. It is already clear that improvement is happening more quickly than the national rate.

2.2 Members will recall the considerable detail on these issues which was made available to them during the production of Norfolk’s Education Development Plan, which has been approved by the Secretary of State, for the period 1999 to 2002. It sets out eight priorities to support our work in raising standards of achievement across all phases of schooling:

 

  1. Performance by Norfolk pupils in the Summer of 2000

    1. Provisional results for the end of Key Stage National Curriculum Tests are now available and the key messages are set out below. Some of the figures may be subject to minor amendment when the results are confirmed in the coming weeks. As yet only national comparisons are available and no data is yet available for other LEAs. A full analysis of the results will be published when the full data are available.
    2.  

    3. Key Stage 1
    4. The percentage of pupils achieving Level 2 or above has increased in all tested areas.

      The increase for reading, writing and mathematics was between 1.5 and 2.6 percentage points with 83.5% achieving that standard in reading, 85.5% in writing and 90.3% in mathematics. Improvement in spelling was 2 percentage points with 71% now reaching the target standard. Significant improvement also occurred in the percentage of pupils achieving Level 2B which is considered to be the best indicator of future attainment; reading 67.9% (up 1.9), writing 57.2% (up 3.2) and mathematics 73.2% (up 10.2). These figures represent a considerable achievement for the pupils and their teachers in Norfolk’s schools. The gap between the number of boys and girls achieving these standards continues to narrow but, other than in mathematics, more girls reach these levels than boys.

    5. Key Stage 2
    6. The percentage of pupils achieving Level 4 or above has also increased in all tested areas.

      74% of children achieved that standard in English in 2000 compared with 69.3% last year. When compared with the Norfolk target, agreed in the Education Development Plan, of 70% to achieve that level by the year 2000 this year’s results are very good. The gap between boy and girl performance is closing but with 79% of girls reaching this standard this is ten percentage points greater than for boys. The mathematics results were 69.9% (compared with 65% last year and 55% in 1998). This is already at the level of the numeracy targets agreed in the EDP, of 70% by the year 2001. Boys and girls results are the same in this subject. Results in science continue to be good and improving with 85% of pupils reaching the Level 4+ standard compared with 78% last year. Boys and girls results are the same in this subject.

      Results in Key Stage 2 have risen faster than the national average. Over the last three years English results in Norfolk have increased by 13% points, 3% points above the rise nationally. In mathematics over the same period results in Norfolk rose by 15% points, 2% points above the national increase. These are a most promising set of results and do credit to the pupils and teachers in Norfolk schools. Norfolk has the highest level of improvement in Key Stage 2 performance over the last three years of any Shire County.

      While not every school sees these levels of improvement there have been some remarkable success stories and the results should do much to build further confidence in our schools that the challenging targets for the next few years can be reached. The literacy and numeracy advisory teams will continue to target support on those schools with greatest need. I have been impressed by the response from those schools we have worked most intensively with in the last year, they have made good use of the additional training and support and most are showing above average improvement.

    7. Secondary education - Key Stage 3, GCSE and A level.

The results in English at KS3 continue to show a disappointing, relative standstill over the last three years in the numbers achieving level 5 and above. Results are nevertheless nearly seven percentage points up over the period 1995-’97. The drop of 1.4 percentage points this year is disappointing after four consecutive years of increase but Norfolk’s results remain on par with the national results in English.

As with the national picture there continues to be a significant difference between the performance of boys and girls in all years when KS3 English has been tested. The gap between boys and girls performance has widened slightly this year, back to 1998 levels. The percentage achieving L6+ is even more marked with 32.4% of girls but only 18.9% of boys reaching that standard.

There is a considerable weight of evidence of the need for a more systematic KS3 Literacy Strategy. This will be even more important for the current Y9 and Y8 who missed out on the major influences of the current National Literacy Strategy which focuses on KS2 and has been in place for just two years.

Mathematics scores have risen four percentage points in the last three years and the pattern is similar to that of other LEAs but Norfolk scores in 1999 were higher than the average for our statistical neighbours. The results this year are very similar to last year. Norfolk’s results continue to be above the national results (6

8% compared to 65% achieving L5+) but the gap has narrowed. The percentage achieving level 6+, at 42%, remains high compared with English. The performance of girls in mathematics has been consistently slightly below that of the boys but the gap in 2000 has narrowed from 2 or 3 percentage points to 0.6.

The results in science show an improvement over the last two years’ results with 63.7% achieving L5+ (66.3% for boys and 63.7% for girls). Norfolk children score above the national average (63.7% compared with 59% nationally) and very similar to the scores in similar authorities.

Girls’ performance in science continues to be significantly below that of boys at KS3.

Results at GCSE have been published for individual schools. A full analysis will be published when the complete L.E.A. data are available.

There has been a national improvement in the percentage of pupils achieving 5+ A* to C grades of 0.9 percentage points. The improvement for Norfolk was 0.4% points. Half of Norfolk secondary schools achieved such improvement and 38% of them improved by over 3 percentage points. Most schools with existing high levels of GCSE success maintained and improved on their previous results and some schools with previously below average results have shown improvements in excess of 10 percentage points. Over the summer the media has made much of the boy / girl differences in examination results. While there are differences overall the picture is very complex with many schools showing significant narrowing of the gap and in some cases there has been a decline in the number of girls achieving 5+A*-C grades. Norfolk has had a small research programme looking into this issue during the last year and a fuller report will be brought to members when all of this year’s data are available.

At A level, the results in Norfolk Sixth forms are slightly higher than last year’s. Almost half the county’s sixth forms have seen at least a one point rise in their average A level points score.

2.7 The preliminary analysis of the publicly available data on school performance paints a generally optimistic picture of the improving standards in Norfolk schools. There is still considerable challenge in the targets the L.E.A. has adopted in the Education Development Plan but, thanks to the hard work of the County’s teachers and their pupils, we should feel confident in our aim of achieving even higher standards.

b. School Improvement Information

2.8 There has been a significant reduction in the total number of schools having difficulties in the twelve months from September 1999 – September 2000. Taking the two categories reported by OFSTED, of "requiring special measures" and those with serious weaknesses there has been continuing success in removing schools from these categories. While there remain some well publicised examples of schools continuing to run into difficulty more schools are being removed from the special measures category than go into it. I would like to pay testimony to the hard work of Education Department staff and the staff and governors of the schools concerned.

 

Evidence from the L.E.A.’s own work with schools shows fewer needing substantial support in September 2000 than in September 1999. The training provided on school evaluation and the introduction of the Norfolk School Self-Review system has helped us improve this position significantly. It has enabled better targeting of support and challenge to those schools most in need of improvement.

While we still have too many schools in Special Measures and Serious Weakness categories there are genuine signs of continuous improvement across all phases of our County’s schools.

  1. LIFETIME LEARNING: THE ADULT AND YOUTH SERVICES

3.1 Adult Service

After a decrease in 1998/9, enrolments increased in 1999/2000 to 27,170 in over 350 venues, an increase of just over 4%. Some fees were reduced and concessions reintroduced for the over 60s.

A Community Technology Centre was established in Norwich in conjunction with New Deal in the Community. 15 community audits were conducted to identify local need. The Service has been involved in SRB initiatives across the County.

The Service has continued to play an active role in the provision of Family Learning and Basic Skills. It has maintained the Basic Skills Agency Kitemark and is working with partners on the production of a County Strategy.

 

 

    1. The Youth Service
    2. The Youth Service has continued to develop on a district by district basis. A Youth Forum has been established. Work with schools has been developed with "At Risk of Exclusion" and Links 4 projects run for young people at risk or not attending school.

      Information and Advice provision has been developed and a Counselling Service launched. The Service is working with District Councils on Community Safety and Norfolk Careers Service in respect of Gateway projects. The Duke of Edinburgh Award Scheme and Millennium Award Projects have been delivered. Support to local communities in the development of youth work and youth clubs has been provided. Study Support has been expanded with a bid for over £1 million made to the New Opportunities Fund.

    3. In 1999/2000 both services have adjusted well. Both face a challenging future with the development of the Connexions Service and the Learning and Skills Council which will directly fund Adult learning. The involvement of schools locally will be promoted through Learning Plus and increased support will be provided for local communities.

  1. THE FINANCIAL POSITION OF SCHOOLS AND RELATED ISSUES

  1. School Balances

4.1 The position of school balances at 31st March 2000 is now known. Table A shows the movement of the total level of school balances summarised by sector, between 31st March 1999, and 31st March, 2000. Table B shows in a similar way the number of schools with deficits and balances.

 

 

  

    1. Table A: School Balances – Value

 

As at 31 March 1999

As at 31 March 2000

Change between years

 

Balance

£m

Overspend

£m

Total

£m

Balance

£m

Overspend

£m

Total

£m

£m

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Primary

6.937

-0.213

6.725

7.420

-0.152

7.268

0.543

8%

Secondary

1.690

-0.724

0.966

1.358

-0.978

0.380

-0.586

-61%

Special

0.419

0.000

0.419

0.510

-0.005

0.505

0.086

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sub Total

9.046

-0.937

8.110

9.288

-1.135

8.153

0.043

-53%

Ex GM

Primary

0

0

0

0.619

0

0.619

0.619

0%

Secondary

0

0

0

0.955

-0.107

0.848

0.848

0%

Totals

9.046

-0.937

8.110

10.862

-1.242

9.620

1.510

19%

Table B: School Balances - Number of Schools

 

As at 31 March 1999

As at 31 March 2000

Change between years

 

Balance

No

Overspend

No

Total

No

Balance

No

Overspend

No

Total

No

In Balance

No

Overspent

No

Primary

337

35

372

350

22

372

13

-13

Secondary

29

10

39

25

14

39

-4

4

Special

12

0

12

11

1

12

-1

1

Sub Total

378

45

423

386

37

423

8

-8

Ex GM

Primary

0

0

0

19

0

19

19

0

Secondary

0

0

0

12

1

13

12

1

Totals

378

45

423

417

38

455

39

-7

 

 

4.3 The tables show that the total level of balances held by schools has increased slightly over the last year, but this is due to the inclusion for the first time of ex-GM Schools. Otherwise the balances position remains static overall, with a significant decline in the secondary sector.

The position with secondary schools is that balances have reduced by £586,000 or 61% over the year. The total number of schools in deficit at 31 March 2000 has also increased from 45 to 75 schools. The value of these deficits is £2.242m an increase of £1.305m or 58%.

4.4 Staffing Adjustments

69 Teachers left last August, compared to 88 the year before. Of these, 15 were redundancies and 43 early retirements.

The effect of re-organisation of schools and DfEE Headteacher scheme have been to boost the number of early retirements this year. Otherwise there would have been a drop this year to about 32 (36 last year).

    1. Recruitment of Teachers

New teachers recruited to Norfolk for September totalled over 500.

Experienced teachers 268

NQTs 247

Total 515

This is the highest for 3 years (346 in 1998 and 370 in 1999). Newly qualified teachers have increased by 100 over previous years. This is very pleasing considering the fiercely competitive market and the "supply" problem. It reflects our own improving teaching recruitment strategy and a growing national perception that Norfolk has an effective scheme of support for newly qualified teachers .

At the beginning of September there were 26 teaching vacancies known about in Primary and Secondary schools in the total teaching workforce of 5674. (These 26 vacancies are known at 11 September 2000).

In addition there are 32 schools with Acting Headteachers out of 455, and 8 covered by the County Headteacher Service (most of these are in the Primary Sector). In the 99/00 academic year 65 Headteacher posts were advertised (in a normal year about 40) and 20 of these were re-advertised indicating the difficulty of recruiting quality Primary Headteachers. However, the number of applications for Primary School Headships had increased recently, mainly due to the better pay structure.

In terms of overall recruitment the picture is as follows:

 Norfolk’s funding of school budgets

4.6 Norfolk has continued to passport all available funding into school budgets, and the budget to SSA comparison for Education shows that spend continues to exceed SSA for the Service.

4.7 The continuing tight financial position for schools described above, nevertheless, is real and results principally from the long term impact of unfunded increased in teachers’ pay awarded by Central Government in recent years adding to an historically stringent position in funding overall needs. Overall, last year was one of a general standstill in terms of the balances/deficits held by schools. Growth in cash funding has been translated into additional teaching posts, as shown by the recruitment figures.

  1. THE WORK OF THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

    1. The Department remains one of the smallest per capita of all English LEAs. The per pupil spend on central administration in Norfolk is £39, compared to the OFSTED family average of £43 and the all Shire County average of £40. The DƒEE target for LEAs is £60. This position was not changed in the Department reshaping earlier this year.
    2. The work of the Department in supporting and challenging schools and in providing direct services to young people and adults in the County was the subject of OFSTED inspection last year. The recommendations in that report, as well as developments arising from a wide range of quarters (notably the Education Development Plan approved by the Secretary of State) are being progressed through the Department’s Service Plan for 2000/1. At the end of six months, progress monitoring of the 173 activities in the Plan showed that 14 had been completed and 131 were on schedule. Progress on the remaining activities is being pursued. In view of the existing day-to-day pressures on the Department, this progress is a tribute to the dedication and professionalism of all the staff involved, to whom I pay tribute.
    3. As part of its continuing desire to achieve improved support for and communication with schools, the Department has commissioned Roehampton Institute to provide detailed feedback on school perceptions of that developing relationship. Invaluable information has been provided concerning areas where there is a perceived need to make further improvements, and schools overall were extremely positive regarding the future of the changing relationship between them and the LEA.

6 SUMMARY

    1. The Education Service in Norfolk in improving rapidly in respect of the number of schools in difficulty. Pupil performance is also making rapid improvement against demanding targets. Funding remains tight across sectors, and Secondary schools had to bite deep into cash balances last year. Teacher recruitment is being closely monitored and there are signs that Norfolk is recruiting well at NQT level. The impact of revised teacher pay scales is not yet clear.

    1. Significant challenges face the Adult and Youth Services in the near future, but both Services are adjusting well and are confident about the future.
    2. The Education Department is making sound progress in developing its relationship with schools.

 

7 RECOMMENDATIONS

That Members discuss the issues raised by this Report.

Officer Contact:

Dr Bryan Slater 01603 223300