Bryan Slater Director of Education |
Distribution |
All Norfolk Headteachers |
This document needs your action as detailed below:
ACTION |
Title
|
Criminal
Records Bureau |
||
Summary of contents |
MI Sheet,
Letter, List and Proforma |
|||
Associated documents |
Criminal
Records Bureau |
|||
Date |
19th
April 2004 |
|||
Summary of action required |
To note and
take action as appropriate |
|||
To be completed by |
30th
April 2004 |
|||
LEA Contact |
Glynis
Ballard |
( |
01603 222522 |
|
E-mail address |
||||
Norfolk Self Review reference |
7. How well is the school led
and managed? 8. How well does the school use
its resources? |
|||
Document reference |
MI 88/04 |
|
CRIMINAL RECORDS BUREAU
It is now nearly two years since the Criminal Records Bureau
commenced operations, and you will recall the difficulties that we all faced at
that time as the Bureau struggled to keep pace with the volumes of Disclosure
Applications that were being sent by Local Education Authorities. Various short
term measures were put in place to help resolve the problems and the CRB itself
has been the subject of a review of its operations that has resulted in
improvements in performance.
I thought it would be timely to recap for you the
procedures that should be followed when requesting checks against police
records and to give some guidance about the positions in schools that are
subject to checks, where it might be more appropriate to request a check
against the DfES List 99, and those situations where a check might not be
necessary at all.
The attached list provides details of positions where the
postholder is subject to a check against police records. Where the postholder
has transferred from a similar post within the Authority and there is evidence
that there has been no break in service with Norfolk LEA, no further CRB check
is required. For all other staff taking up positions that are subject to checks
coming from another employer or where there has been a break in service, a CRB
check must be undertaken.
Supply Teachers
Supply teachers should not be employed to work with
children until all pre-employment checks have been completed, including a CRB
check. All supply teachers included on Norfolk’s Supply Teachers Register will
have had all of these checks completed before their details are released.
If your school uses supply teachers provided by an agency,
you will need to satisfy yourself that a CRB check has been undertaken before
the teacher works with children.
Overseas Teachers
When a teacher recently arrived from overseas is
appointed, the CRB will be unable to provide a disclosure as there will be no
records held against addresses in this country. Nor will it be appropriate to
undertake a List 99 check.
As part of the school’s normal recruitment processes in
these situations, the teacher could be required to contact the appropriate
bodies in their previous country of residence for a “Certificate of Good
Conduct”. You will need to be aware, however, that the provision of these
varies from country to country, as does the extent of checks made against
police records.
Further information about obtaining a certificate of good
conduct can be found on the CRB website www.crb.gov.uk
Volunteers
What is a volunteer?
For CRB purposes, the Regulations define a volunteer as a
person who: ‘is engaged in any
activity which involves spending time, unpaid (except for travelling and other
approved out-of-pocket expenses), doing something which aims to benefit some
third party other than or in addition to a close relative’.
Guidance from the DfES confirms that all volunteers who
have regular contact with children must be subject to at least a List 99 check,
regardless of whether they have unsupervised access to children. However, where
volunteers have the opportunity for regular, unsupervised or one to one contact
then a CRB check must be undertaken.
Volunteers at one off events, where there will be no
unsupervised access to children would not normally need a CRB check.
There are of course many other categories of volunteers,
and Headteachers working with their Governing Bodies will need to apply their
professional judgement in deciding where CRB checks are needed. The criteria
that should be taken into account in these circumstances would include:
The duration, frequency and nature of the contact with
children,
·
Any other information that the school would have about
the volunteer,
·
Whether the volunteer is well known to the school community,
·
Whether the volunteer has other employment or
undertakes voluntary activities where referees could advise on suitability.
·
Attached to this letter is a pro forma that schools
need to use when applying for a List 99 check only.
There are a number of other situations where it would not
normally be necessary to apply for a disclosure. These include:
·
Visitors who have business with the Headteacher or
other school staff, or who have brief contact with children with a teacher
present,
·
Visitors who come on site only to carry out repairs or
service equipment,
·
Building contractors, as children should not be allowed
in areas where builders are working on health and safety grounds,
·
People who are on site before or after school hours
when children are not present.
Contractors
Where schools have catering, cleaning or grounds
maintenance staff in schools that are provided by a contractor, it is the
responsibility of that contractor to have its staff checked. NCS, for example,
check all staff going into schools. This is a specific requirement contained in
any contract for these services with the Authority or with schools.
The contract for the provision of the schools courier
service will contain a clause requiring all staff visiting schools to have a
CRB check undertaken, and evidence will be required by the LEA on a regular
basis.
Should schools have any concerns about staff provided for
these services then the contractors can be contacted direct to verify that all
necessary checks have been undertaken.
Administrative Arrangements
The turnaround times for CRB checks have improved
significantly since the agency was first established.
The average time taken by the CRB to complete a check is now
in the region of 3 to 4 weeks. This does however still vary from case to case
and can be influenced by the amount of time it takes Police Authorities to
check against previous addresses.
The CRB has also identified that a major cause for delays
in the process is the failure by applicants to complete the Disclosure
Application correctly. In order to avoid delays resulting from incomplete
application forms it is necessary to ensure that:
·
The form is completed in black ink
·
A full five year address history is provided
·
All previous names are listed and verified
·
All proofs of identity are listed, it is not sufficient
just to rely on a passport or a photo driving licence, as much of Section X
must be completed as possible. At least one proof of identity must have
details of the applicant’s present address.
When the disclosure application is received in Education
Personnel Services, a check is made against List 99 before the form is sent to
the CRB. Schools will be notified as soon as the Disclosure is received from
the CRB. The Disclosure itself is retained by EPS for six months after the date of issue in case of queries, but
details are kept on a separate database as evidence that checks have been
undertaken.
Where a List 99 check only has been made, the form
requesting the check will be returned to the school and should be retained at
school level.
I hope that the above is a helpful reminder of the process
involved in requesting checks against police records. However, I should like to
take this opportunity to remind schools that the CRB process is just one part
of any sound recruitment process that should be in place to help ensure that
our schools provide a safe environment for children in Norfolk.
Yours sincerely
Bryan Slater
Director of Education